The launch of the Regulation Matters campaign is a landmark step in the movement to register childcarers in the UK. You may have read our previous blog post questioning the need for nannies to be registered (here) in which we openly questioned the workability of forcing nannies to comply with existing requirements. In this blog post we want to look at what regulation is, some of the reasons why regulation matters and why, given a suitable framework, we are supporting this.
Regulation means that all individuals will be appropriately checked, have received training in First Aid and the common core skills for childcare and hold liability insurance. It does not mean that nannies will be required to change the way that they work, deliver the EYFS, be inspected or, in short, become childminders in a child’s home. We are passionate about preserving the unique, tailored service a nanny can provide and that is why we are taking an active part in this campaign.
The answer to why it matters could be summed up in a single word. Safeguarding. Regulation helps to keep children safe. Detractors will say that regulation is interfering in people’s lives and restricting parental choice, and on one level they are right. Regulation will remove from the workforce those who are found to be unsuitable to care for children, or those who do not have the right to work in the UK, thus removing those candidates as choices. Unfortunately in some cases parents are not aware of how to carry out appropriate checks, or are unwilling to do so, and in those cases society has a duty to protect its most vulnerable members.
Children cared for by nannies are at home, alone, often for extended periods of time. Many parents will attest that this period of transition can be unsettling and most simply attribute any changes in behaviour to a new person but you only need to do a little reading of parenting discussion boards to find a handful for parents who are concerned that these changes are the result of something more sinister. A robust regulatory system would help to put those parents’ minds at ease.
It is important, however, to mention that these systems are not foolproof. When we talk about high profile cases, such as that of the nursery worker Vanessa George convicted of abusing children in her care, we blame the regulators for not doing their job. It is important to remember that in that case it was the responsibility of the nursery management to carry out checks and ensure policies were followed, and it would remain the responsibility of parents to verify their chosen carer’s background. Whilst regulation may have failed to stop one case, it has potentially stopped hundreds more.
It isn’t just from rogue childcarers that children need protection. Nannies have an important role to play in safeguarding too. It is currently not compulsory for a nanny to have received, let alone kept up to date, any form if safeguarding training. If regulation included compulsory training on safeguarding and the associated procedures nannies would be well equipped to recognise any child protection problems, deal with disclosures appropriately and report where necessary.
At BAPN we want all nannies to be seen as professionals, and meet professional standards. We believe that the current, opt-in, light-touch system is not enough. We want to go further but we want it to work. This is why we are launching a consultation into the effectiveness of the vOCR and asking for your help to improve it. You can find the form on our website or share your experiences informally by emailing us on info@bapn.org.uk